Monthly Archive for June, 2007

Are the BBC Trying to Wind Us Up?!

Probably not, but I couldn’t help rolling my eyes and cursing (once more) the “evil developers” when reading this article from the BBC website.

Apparently said evil doers are buying up properties with large gardens or on large plots of land (that’ll be us then), and destroying them by building flats, mini-estates, and all kinds of other monstrosities that are killing the neighbourhoods and ruining the living environment.

As much as I dislike this sort of behaviour, and I really like living here in the wilderness (at least until Milton Keynes comes along and swallows us whole one day), I do wonder if we should give the developers a call and find how they do this!  Doesn’t it just seem so stupid this can go on, when we’re struggling so hard to hatch our tiny little plan.  We don’t even want to chop down the trees here, we LIKE the trees around here!   Hell, we may even plant some more in the process of getting rid of the ugly tarmac.

Not that any of this matters in planning law.  Blinkered as it is.

Bad News from the Planning Consultant

But maybe every cloud has a silver lining, just some more than others?

We had our report, or strategy, from the planning consultants arrive on Monday, and it really didn’t make pleasant reading.  Due to the planning history, and (much) more the point local planning policy, it’s time to get real and write off any chance of achieving the initial goal of two new homes/properties for the family on the site.

It’s frustrating to say the least, especially when they’re building about four hundred homes in open fields only a couple of miles away at Cranfield, and over a thousand in open countryside only a couple of miles away in the other direction to expand Milton Keynes.  Yet we cant use our own land to build a couple of new homes for the family.   The planning system really does truly suck.  While I can understand the spirit of the policies regarding “open countryside” (yes, ignore the properties either side of us in our “Hamlet”, both residential and commercial, we ARE apparently in open countryside, but NOT green belt), and the desire to preserve this green and pleasant land, it seems very rigid, and poorly balanced.

We cant re-jig, use space that is currently car park, and modernise and improve the plot and local area in general on a very small scale, while all around us, large open fields and farmland are being obliterated by developing towns and cities, with plans to do even more of the same over the coming years.  It’s madness.  If they want to preserve the countryside, why is John Lewis building the warehouse from hell just down the road (now THAT has spoiled some views), or building loads of new homes on the outskirts of Milton Keynes.  Why cant “they” consider our new places as part of their targets for thousands of new homes in the area?!

Anyway, enough ranting!

We’ve arranged to meet and talk to Al from the Planning Consultants next week, to discuss alternative, scaled down proposals.  Whatever we want to do, it’s not going to be easy, and we’re probably in for the “long game”, but we just want to be able to use this space better, and make it a better living environment for our family, and a better working environment for the company.  Shouldn’t  be too much to ask!

Prior to the bad news coming through, we also had a chat with the head of the Parish Council.  He’s amazed we got so firmly rebuked by the planning department with our pre-application, and is willing to do anything he can to put some weight behind our plans.  Not sure how much real help the Parish Council can give, but it’s nice to know someone appreciates we’re just trying to make it so we stay in the Village, and in Mid Beds, in a place we’re happy living in.

We want to build an environmentally friendly home, we live and work in the same place, we’re after just the sort of thing the government and various environmental groups keep saying they’re all for.  No commuting to and from the office, building on land that’s already paved over and not attractive, improving living standards and the rural environment, building a low cost (to run), efficient home, and improving the current house (which is appalling for energy and running costs).  You know, doing “the right thing”.  Only it feels just now that nobody wants us to.  It’d be much easier to buy an inefficient box home miles away from work, pulling people out of the rural communities they apparently want to protect, and increasing our “carbon footprint” as we start commuting to work.  Great.

Anyway, we’re not giving up, every avenue must be pursued  and investigated, at the very least to stop us wondering “what if…?”, and at the most, so we can work this out and get us a place to live, in a place we want to live!

Local Newsletter Speaking Our Language

But not sure it’s worth the paper it’s printed on?

We received our local newsletter last week, which is a (very) small publication with details of local happenings, election news and such. This edition did have something of direct interest to us, in the form of a letter from the Chairman of the Parish Council.

The published letter was concerning planning an development in the area, and it seemed to be “talking to us”. Now, if this sort of thing carries any weight at all I doubt it, which almost makes it as frustrating as encouraging when in our situation, but this is an extract:

We have recently responded to the East of England revised plan for development in Bedfordshire - the report will be published in July 2007.

We care about our residents but the development programmed for Milton Keynes is causing great concerns to our lovely villages and many other villages in Bedfordshire. At Broughton Gate 1,500 dwellings are being built; at Fen Farm John Lewis will be opening a distribution centre in 2009, employing 280 personnel at Home Farm in Cranfield there is a development in process of 400 dwellings and there is concern that there may be 3,00 extra dwellings built in Aspley Guise so I can only hope that our residents from Hulcote and Salford will try to keep our villages rural and undeveloped as much as possible. Any small development should be for residents only, i.e. siblings etc as we do not have the sustainability, water, sewage infrastructure in place for any development at present.

With the help of our MP Nadine Dorries and many other Government members and opposition Members of Parliament, our voice is heard loud and clear. Our County Councillor Roger Baker and District COuncillors Alan Bastable & Ken Mathews have been very helpful in the pasts and will continue in the future.

So, as you can see the letter is very against development, with exception of our sort of project, for family and siblings. Even now we’re unsure what weight, if any, the local Parish Council and Councillors carry in these matters. It feels frustrating we want to develop and improve out little corner of the Village, but the initial response has been nothing but negatives and set backs, words of warning and advice to take the most “softly softly” approach we can.

It seems insane that we’ve seen nearby (literally within a few miles) green fields being obliterated for new developments to expand Milton Keynes, both residential and HUGE commercial/industrial in nature. Yet all we want is to use our own land to make it look nicer and improve the way it’s used to set the family up in local (good quality) housing, and we’re just swimming against the tide.

General feeling now with myself and Abi is a combination of determination and extreme frustration.